Friday, March 8, 2013

Constitutional Rigts v. Gimme Rights



            The Bill of Rights was not part of the document the Framers produced in Philadelphia but was added later in order to get reluctant states, those fearful of an all powerful central government, to ratify. And until the Supreme Court invented the incorporation doctrine, the Bill of Rights applied to the Federal government only. Only after the War of Northern Aggression and the cruel excesses of Reconstruction was the Bill of Rights extended to the states.
Even so, for all that history the rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights remain simple and straightforward: speech, assembly, press, and religion; self defense with firearms; no unlawful searches and seizures; no self incrimination; and no cruel and unusual punishments, to name the better known.
Today, however, many people insist that other Constitutional rights exist in spite of the fact that in the U.S. Constitution
1.      There is no right to kill babies in the womb.
2.      There is no right to serve in the armed forces
3.      There is no right to own a house
4.      There is no right to free medical care.
5.      There is no right to employment
6.      There is no right to an education.
 Nevertheless, people assert these rights. For example, despite the Supreme Court invented right to abortion codified in Roe v. Wade, there is no such right in the Constitution. Before Roe abortion was permitted in some states, denied in others. Should Roe ever be overturned, the nation will return to the status quo ante, and who knows, more states, even a majority will pass liberalized abortion laws. Had the Supreme Court refused to rule in Roe and left abortion regulation to the states, abortion laws most likely would have been liberalized in many states, and the religious right as we now know it might never have arisen or have become so influential in politics. Think about that, those readers made apoplectic by the pro life movement.
Another example of made up rights: against human experience, practicality, and common sense, people insist that there is a right to serve in the armed forces and furthermore that women and the openly homosexual have an extraordinary right to serve, the consequences to good order, discipline, and efficiency be damned. And, I might add, should openly homosexual men be allowed to serve but are later determined to undermine good order and discipline, under no circumstances will openly homosexual service be rescinded. As with women, moral cowards in leadership positions will deny problems associated with their service, no matter how readily apparent. And by the way, denial of entrance into the armed forces to the openly homosexual is not the same as being forced to the back of the bus or being denied entrance to school. Suggestions to the contrary outrage many African Americans.    
Other examples: people have a right to own a house. The government’s push to guarantee that right has bankrupted to country. Still another right: people have a right to medical care. That imperative will degrade medical care for everyone and push the government deeper into insolvency. Then there is the right to a job. In practice, the exercise of this right in some areas means that incompetent, unqualified, and insubordinate employees cannot be discharged because of union negotiated and legislatively mandated rules.
Finally, the assumed right to an education: this has dumbed down learning to the point where young people spend lots of time learning very little. Someone suggested to me that were it not for public schools the poor would not be educated. Here’s a flash. The poor don’t get educated now even though more money is spent on them than ever. Programs to improve learning for poor children have not worked and will not work for reasons too many to discuss here.  
            Humorist P.J O’Rourke calls the rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights, “Get outta here rights!” because they limit the government’s power to interfere with citizens’ personal freedoms. He calls the rights I discuss above “Gimme rights” because they demand material benefits from government. Gimme rights, of course, come at a high price: a government that can do anything for you can do anything to you. A society that insists upon more and more gimme rights is a society of less and less freedom, and in our case, a society in decline. Look for the spectacle of people demonstrating in the streets in Europe now because their governments can no longer afford the gimme rights to which they think they are entitled to repeat itself here.
           

No comments:

Post a Comment